Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法下载作为进阶阅读
caution, as they may not always be accurate or appropriate.
Publication date: 10 March 2026
Immediately after Fincke's medical event, NASA officials said they wouldn't name the affected astronaut, citing medical privacy concerns. During a news briefing the next day, NASA's chief health and medical officer J.D. Polk said the incident wasn't an injury in the course of work, though he stopped short of saying whether it was some other kind of injury.