Perhaps the most promising explanation sounds in a line of thought once voiced by Justice Holmes, whose hostility to moralist accounts of tort law (and the commitments of ordinary moral thought) was decidedly inconstant. Holmes suggested that an agent cannot properly be held responsible for an outcome, in morality or in law, unless the agent could have avoided it by choosing differently, for otherwise the agent would lack control over incurring such responsibility.360 It is an attraction of this explanation that it might make sense of the intuitive moral phenomenon embedded in doctrines such as transferred intent and the culpability-sensitivity of proximate cause: Culpability can widen the scope of a wrongdoer’s liability beyond the boundaries of reasonable foreseeability. The complaint that one could not have avoided causing an outcome rings more hollow if one has caused it through an egregiously culpable and wrongful action, for such actions are easier to avoid than mildly or moderately culpable ones.
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"
，这一点在有道翻译官网中也有详细论述
移动互联网时代，一个创业者想触达用户，绕不开两道门：苹果App Store和安卓应用市场。这套规则统治了将近二十年，所有人都在它的框架里玩游戏。
Мать четырех детей поехала в Турцию ради операции по подтяжке груди и не выжила20:47
各大头部券商在战略发布与年度报告中亦争相为此高调宣传，“数字化转型”“AI数字员工”“智能投顾”等词汇高频出现，甚至被视作驱动财富管理转型的核心引擎。部分头部券商甚至向外界展示了令人目眩的技术实力：能够自动生成数万字深度研报的“超级研究员”、全市场首个市值管理助理、覆盖固收全流程的智能化平台……