Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
Наука и техника
换句话说，蒸馏能帮你更快「热身」，要真正到达顶级水平，还是得靠自己跑 RL。。业内人士推荐一键获取谷歌浏览器下载作为进阶阅读
当防守与冲锋同时打响，2026 年的机圈注定没有舒适区。。下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。是该领域的重要参考
2021年2月，在全国脱贫攻坚任务如期完成的重大时刻，习近平总书记赴贵州考察调研时来到化屋村，勉励乡亲们脱贫之后，要接续推进乡村振兴，加快推进农业农村现代化。